Bhau

Posted on Nov 21, 2022Read on Mirror.xyz

The Value of Trustlessness

Whereas Trust is delegated to 3rd parties in our legacy systems, Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) systems are Trustless. This means Trust is embedded within computer code, and so the network participants do not need to Trust each other for the system to function. This is important because, in legacy systems, 3rd parties extract value due to Moral Hazard.

In Economics, a Moral Hazard arises when there is no incentive to guard against the Risk of negative outcomes. I.e. why worry about gambling with billions, when the fine will be only a few million?

A Transaction is an event. Therefore, Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) is a breakthrough in our collective ability to verify events. In Traditional Finance, this is a simple accounting of balances on a centralized ledger, and it is reliant upon 3rd parties for verification.

Whether it’s information, goods, services, or anything of value – an exchange will require the accounting of balances.

The two-sided accounting of debits and credits is known as Double-Entry Accounting. This method of book-keeping necessitates auditing (verification) by 3rd parties to assure nobody is “cooking their books” (See: Enron, 2008 Global Financial Crisis, and more recently FTX, Celsius, Voyager, 3AC, Terra-LUNA).

Trustlessness of Bitcoin

In 2008, The Bitcoin Network pioneered the innovation of Trustless Value Exchange by employing Triple-Entry Accounting.

This event – the accounting of balances without third parties – is verified by the network of distributed ledgers with the Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm.

Triple-Entry Accounting combines the two-sided accounting of debits and credits - the subtracting of numbers on one ledger, and the subsequent addition of those numbers in another ledger - with nearly instantaneous auditing and verification of the event, facilitated by cryptography and distributed computing.

Learn more: What is Bitcoin? A Paradigm Shift: The Trust Revolution - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgYEpAvl66ZPpxst4cpayp9bQGhgk8sNw

As evidenced by the title Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, Trustless Value Exchange was the intended purpose, and it is an important advancement for humanity.

Trustlessness of Ethereum

The Ethereum Network builds upon this breakthrough: it couples Trustless Value Exchange with the Trustless Execution of Contracts. In web3, such contracts are known as Smart Contracts 🤝.

In the pre-web3 world, Contracts were facilitated, audited, and enforced by third parties (E.g., the legal code in a jurisdiction). In web3, Smart Contracts are facilitated, audited, and enforced in a peer-to-peer manner without 3rd parties.

Ethereum was previously governed with a Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm, which required miners.

Smart Contracts 🤝 are executed within the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).

By eliminating middlemen and value extraction mechanisms…

…end users can obtain better interest rates on their U.S. dollars in Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Decentralized applications (dApps) like Compound and Aave are exclusively peer-to-peer.

This means your coins are custodied - held - by Smart Contracts and your Digital Wallet only. No humans are involved. Self-Custody.

DeFiRate - https://defirate.com/lend

In contrast, custodians like Gemini, Coinbase, and Nexo are NOT exclusively peer-to-peer. They are centralized entities. Human operated.

Once you give them custody of your coins, they are free to do with them as they please. Moral Hazard compels.

These entities have been known to take customer funds and gamble with them (margin leverage is what they like to call it), enabling them to offer deceptively high yields. But as recent events have shown, most of them are essentially pyramid schemes driven by Greed.

If it is a black box, it is centralized. dApps like Compound and Aave exercising the judicious application of Smart Contracts are permission-less and transparent, allowing complete scrutiny of transactions (auditing) on block explorers like Etherscan.

E.g., depositing USDC into Aave will send an interest-bearing “a” token to your digital wallet. Below, a user deposited $1 USDC into Aave on Ethereum’s Layer 2 Arbitrum Network, and received an interest-bearing Aave token denoted as “aArbUSDC.”

Transaction Hash -https://arbiscan.io/tx/0x0f9cf4a46db4d50763c958708ffa1a66ea76c5310ef549bbc3c12456b0234ed6

Similarly, your digital wallet will receive a “UNI-V2” token for providing liquidity to an AMM (Automated Market Maker) DEX (Decentralized Exchange) like Uniswap. And so forth.

Transaction Hash -https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb3205c61fbefd4932cd7d96d13bff8540c3759fbdb32bdfaebc7f89ff9b3689d

This exemplifies Triple-Entry Accounting, and unlocks Double-Token Debt. Aave is an imperfect analogy because the creditor’s claim is not “callable” by the Smart Contract, hence the one-sided arrow.

More on Double-Token Debts in the Buttonwood Zero Whitepaper - https://cdn-scaliomcms-stage.s3.amazonaws.com/root/resource/lg/Buttonwood-Zero-Whitepaper-pdf-1656717059753.pdf

Learn more at button.foundation.

Trustlessness of Medicine

There is none.

But it’s easy to change this. Our identities are basically NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) sitting in the healthcare system’s centralized ledger. We upload our identities to a Distributed Ledger, so that we can self-custody our NFTs.

Physicians are invited to HPEC.

And then we build a new healthcare system, modeled upon DeFi’s Hierarchy of Needs:

collect://