Bridges are indispensable for a multi-chain ecosystem. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of all the bridges I use.
1/Across
Fast, safe and low cost is its advantage. Currently, it can be cross-chain between arbitrum optimism and boba and other L2 and Ethereum. It is mainly based on stablecoins, eth and usdc, and is suitable for small cross-chains. No tokens are issued ( snapshot)
2/connext
Both xpollinate and Li.fi are from connext, and the main bridge nomad linking evmos is also power by connext. In addition to supporting multi-chain, multi-currency, and fast speed, its huge ecology and technology are the guarantee of security. Suitable for cross-chain needs less than $50,000.
https://bridge.connext.network/
3/Bungee
Bungee at its core, is a bridge aggregator. It can be thought of as 1Inch, or Paraswap for cross-chain swaps. By also integrating DEXs & DEX aggregators, Bungee enables easy & efficient cross-chain swaps for users.
Bungee is a one-stop app for all your bridging needs. Using Bungee, you can be sure that you are enjoying the best routes for your bridging journey. We also allow users to optimize their route based on: 1)Maximum output on the destination chain 2)Minimum GAS fee 3)Lowest Bridging Time 4)Security
4/orbiter
Orbiter Finance is a decentralized cross-rollup Layer 2 bridge with a contract only on the destination side. It already supports transfer between zkSync and Arbitrum, the cost is low, and the process is instant. If you want to go zksync and don't want to spend a lot of time, orbiter is a very good choice.
5/meson
If you just want a small cross-chain stablecoin, meson is a very good choice. There is no slippage. At present, it is still fee-free. You can try it.
For me I used Orbiter and Across for ETH and Meson for USDC/USDT.