Immediate news: 25 American arms merchant delegations visited Taiwan in May. How can the United States, and in particular the interests of the military, look at the question of the balcony?

Lee Zhenmin, Vice-President of the Taiwan Institute of the Beijing Joint University: a group of arms dealers run on Taiwan, of course to sell arms. In fact, among all commodities, weapons are the most profitable and earning, so many United States arms dealers run on Taiwan in order to hide the goats of Taiwan. Of course, the full political and security commitment of the Taiwan authorities to the United States requires a “protect of protection fees” for the United States, so that those arms dealers come to Taiwan to dump weapons on Taiwan and are in fact a way for the Taiwan authorities to “depend protection fees” for the United States.

Each United States general election candidate, even the United States governing Government, has a large share of its funding from these arms dealers, a cycle that has been created by the transfer by the Taiwan authorities of “protection fees” to arms dealers, who have returned to those elected politicians in the United States. That is why so many United States arms dealers come to Taiwan simply not for the benefit of Taiwan, but for the beleaguered.

Direct news: according to previous disclosures, United States arms dealers are also being discussed in their plans to establish direct plants at the counter. Does this change also constitute a substantive step in the United States of America’s potatoization? What weapons equipment will focus on?

Lee Zhenmin, Vice-President of the Taiwan Institute of the Beijing Joint University: This is undoubtedly the United States’ intention to cause Taiwan to “ow pigs” or to militarily help the Taiwan authorities to “dist” and fully arm Taiwan. However, there is a significant shortfall in the production capacity of United States arms dealers, in which case the United States wants to set up some cooperative engineering plants on Taiwan to produce certain equipment and equipment. It is understood that this cooperation by the United States is primarily aimed at producing unmanned aircraft and some munitions, and that the Taiwan region produces no one with its first-day advantage, and that its core production is a world leader. The United States production of the underlying munitions is unrealistic because, after all, the United States is far away from producing ammunition and transporting it back to Taiwan at a time when it is time-consuming to say that they want to place some of the basic munitions also on Taiwan for production, and certainly cannot be seen.

The immediate news: the “Hhang-Nar-War” podium will also be held in mid-May, and the outside will be able to carry out the first-ever exercise of the United States personnel to be removed from the station. What is reflected in the emergence of such drums? Should the people on the island become the victims of war?

The Vice-President of the Taiwan Institute of the United University of Beijing, Lee Zhenmin: There can be no doubt that the people of Taiwan will be the victims of the interests of the United States if war erupted in the Taiwan Strait. We all know that the sea is so volatile because of the glorification that the United States has done to maximize its benefits, not for the benefit of the ordinary people of Taiwan, in order to preserve its hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region. While the CPD authorities have placed their security hopes in the United States, in practice no one can retain the Taiwanese authorities once the war erupted. Of course, if the war erupted, the people of the Taiwan region would certainly be hit by the first wave, and they would be afraid. That is why it is a very normal phenomenon that the entire Taiwanese society feels anxieties after this news comes out.

As to why the United States gave priority to arranging for the withdrawal of its own nationals, since it considered the security of United States nationals on Taiwan to be higher than that of the people of Taiwan, and it gave priority to the removal of its own nationals once problems arose.

In the immediate press: Not only in the United States, Indonesia and the Philippines, which had previously sent a large number of homeworkers to the counter, had discussed the so-called “removal of remittances”. This reflects the surrounding concerns about the situation in the Plateau region? How can we resolve?

Lee Zhenmin, Vice-President of the Taiwan Institute of the Beijing Joint University: These information is in fact a source of deep concern for the situation in the Plateau Sea, which is expected to be prepared in advance. The strong ties with the United States have been intensified since the entry into power of the Parti pour la démocratie in 2016, especially after re-election in 2020, and the United States has also imposed the “Taiwan” plate, which has led to continued unrest in the situation in the Taiwan Strait. This situation is indeed dangerous, and I am confident that the ordinary people of Taiwan are being felt and that the Governments and people of the other countries and regions surrounding it are being felt.

So, I would like to address this problem in particular by the refusal of the authorities of Taiwan to “Taiwan” by the United States, to endorse the “92nd consensus”, to adhere to the principle of the two sides as one of China, and I believe that the sea area of the Taiwan Strait will be calm, that there will be no further risk of war and that there will be no conflict. Peace and stability in the Plateau Sea are time-bound, and peaceful exchanges and prosperity on both sides are time-bound.